Alabama Remains No. 1 in BCS Rankings
The newest BCS rankings had a change in the important number two slot as Oregon jumped Florida State. Meanwhile, Alabama's stronghold on the top position is unchanged. Take a look at all of the rankings below.
| Harris | USA | Today | Computer | BCS | ||||||
| Rk | Pts | Pct | Rk | Pts | Pct | Rk | Pct | Avg | Pv | |
| 1. Alabama | 1 | 2590 | .9962 | 1 | 1542 | .9948 | 1 | .990 | .9937 | 1 |
| 2. Oregon | 2 | 2492 | .9585 | 2 | 1483 | .9568 | 2 | .940 | .9517 | 3 |
| 3. Florida St. | 3 | 2386 | .9177 | 3 | 1419 | .9155 | 3 | .930 | .9211 | 2 |
| 4. Ohio St. | 4 | 2301 | .8850 | 4 | 1375 | .8871 | 4 | .880 | .8840 | 4 |
| 5. Stanford | 6 | 2035 | .7827 | 7 | 1182 | .7626 | 5 | .830 | .7918 | 6 |
| 6. Baylor | 5 | 2130 | .8192 | 5 | 1293 | .8342 | 10 | .640 | .7645 | 8 |
| 7. Miami | 7 | 1997 | .7604 | 6 | 1190 | .7677 | 6 | .740 | .7560 | 7 |
| 8. Clemson | 8 | 1767 | .6796 | 8 | 1064 | .6865 | 10 | .640 | .6687 | 9 |
| 9. Missouri | 9 | 1510 | .5808 | 10 | 834 | .5381 | 8 | .710 | .6096 | 5 |
| 10. Oklahoma | 10 | 1475 | .5673 | 9 | 933 | .6019 | 9 | .650 | .6064 | 15 |
| 11. Auburn | 11 | 1453 | .5588 | 11 | 804 | .5187 | 7 | .730 | .6025 | 11 |
| 12. Texas A&M | 13 | 1364 | .5246 | 14 | 758 | .4890 | 14 | .430 | .4812 | 16 |
| 13. LSU | 12 | 1408 | .5415 | 13 | 802 | .5174 | 16 | .330 | .4630 | 13 |
| 14. South Carolina | 17 | 1043 | .4012 | 16 | 627 | .4045 | 12 | .540 | .4486 | 21 |
| 15. Texas Tech | 14 | 1093 | .4204 | 15 | 673 | .4342 | 17 | .270 | .3749 | 10 |
| 16. Fresno St. | 18 | 965 | .3712 | 18 | 542 | .3497 | 15 | .380 | .3669 | 17 |
| 17. N. Illinois | 20 | 650 | .2500 | 20 | 373 | .2406 | 13 | .510 | .3335 | 18 |
| 18. Oklahoma St. | 15 | 1081 | .4158 | 12 | 803 | .5181 | 29 | .000 | .3113 | 19 |
| 19. Louisville | 16 | 1056 | .4062 | 17 | 579 | .3735 | 29 | .000 | .2599 | 20 |
| 20. UCLA | 19 | 683 | .2627 | 19 | 432 | .2787 | 21 | .160 | .2338 | 12 |
| 21. Michigan | 21 | 528 | .2031 | 21 | 309 | .1994 | 21 | .160 | .1875 | 22 |
| 22. Michigan St. | 23 | 391 | .1504 | 24 | 237 | .1529 | 18 | .240 | .1811 | NR |
| 23. UCF | 22 | 502 | .1931 | 22 | 300 | .1935 | 23 | .150 | .1789 | 23 |
| 24. Wisconsin | 24 | 350 | .1346 | 23 | 253 | .1632 | 29 | .000 | .0993 | NR |
| 25. Notre Dame | 26 | 91 | .0350 | 25 | 83 | .0535 | 19 | .190 | .0928 | NR |
___
| AH | RB | CM | KM | JS | PW | |
| 1. Alabama | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
| 2. Oregon | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 3 |
| 3. Florida St. | 2 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 2 |
| 4. Ohio St. | 4 | 3 | 3 | 8 | 5 | 4 |
| 5. Stanford | 6 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 6 |
| 6. Baylor | 10 | 11 | 7 | 12 | 9 | 10 |
| 7. Miami | 5 | 15 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
| 8. Clemson | 11 | 7 | 11 | 10 | 11 | 8 |
| 9. Missouri | 9 | 9 | 8 | 5 | 10 | 7 |
| 10. Oklahoma | 7 | 6 | 9 | 11 | 13 | 12 |
| 11. Auburn | 8 | 18 | 10 | 6 | 7 | 5 |
| 12. Texas A&M | 16 | 19 | 13 | 13 | 18 | 14 |
| 13. LSU | 20 | 10 | 23 | 15 | 20 | 16 |
| 14. South Carolina | 12 | 8 | 18 | 9 | 16 | 13 |
| 15. Texas Tech | 18 | 14 | 16 | 22 | 22 | 21 |
| 16. Fresno St. | 13 | 25 | 14 | - | 14 | 11 |
| 17. N. Illinois | 17 | 12 | 12 | 14 | 3 | 15 |
| 18. Oklahoma St. | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 19. Louisville | - | 17 | - | - | - | - |
| 20. UCLA | 25 | 20 | - | 19 | 23 | 20 |
| 21. Michigan | 14 | 22 | 17 | 24 | - | 25 |
| 22. Michigan St. | 23 | - | 15 | 18 | 17 | 22 |
| 23. UCF | - | 16 | 25 | - | 21 | 17 |
| 24. Wisconsin | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 25. Notre Dame | 21 | 13 | 21 | 20 | 25 | 23 |
___
| Explanation Key |
|---|
The BCS Average is calculated by averaging the percent totals of the Harris Interactive, USA Today Coaches and Computer polls. Team percentages are derived by dividing a team's actual voting points by a maximum 2600 possible points in the Harris Interactive Poll and 1550 possible points in the USA Today Coaches Poll.
Six computer rankings are used to determine the overall computer component. The highest and lowest ranking for each team is dropped, and the remaining four are added and divided to produce a Computer Rankings Percentage. The six computer ranking providers are Anderson & Hester, Richard Billingsley, Colley Matrix, Kenneth Massey, Jeff Sagarin, and Peter Wolfe. Each computer ranking accounts for schedule strength in its formula.
Copyright 2013 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
More From Tide 100.9
